Homes Get Smaller, More Energy Efficient

What features do buyers want today and in the future? The answer: smaller, more energy efficient homes.

The average size of a new single-family home in 2010 was 2,377 square feet, down from 2,438 square feet in 2009 and down from the peak of 2,520 square feet in 2007 and 2008, according to U.S. Census Bureau data presented by Rose Quint, assistant vice president of survey research for NAHB at the International Builders' Show in Orlando Thursday, Jan. 13.

And the trend will only continue, Quint said, with the 2015 new home size currently projected at 2,150 square feet with fewer bathrooms and smaller garages.

It's hard to say whether home sizes will decline to 1970 levels of 1,500 square feet. But Quint says she believes smaller sizes are here to stay based on demographics.

The U.S. population was 310 million as of April 2010. That's expected to rise to 322 million in 2015 and continue to climb up to 422 million by 2050. The population is also getting older and more diverse. In 2010, 25 percent were over the age of 55, which is expected to grow to 31 percent by 3050.

This rising segment of older home owners will not want to care for huge spaces, Quint said. Then you have Generation Y buyers who are very energy conscious. "People are coming to realize, 'Let's buy what we need,'" said Quint.

The Census Bureau data is congruent with NAHB's findings that builders expect to build smaller homes with more green features in the next five years. Low energy windows, water efficient features, engineered wood beams, joints, or trusses, and energy star ratings are expected to be more revenant.

Builders also expect an increase in living room size as well as more planning for universal design features with homes more easily adaptable for future improvements, said Quint.

Jill Waage, executive editor with Better Homes and Gardens, also presented her magazine's 2011 consumer preferences survey, which was taken the first week of December. According to Waage, the top three improvement priorities for home owners are a laundry room, additional storage, and a home office. "The connection to outdoor living space is also really important," Waage said.

Other trends included in the Better Homes and Gardens study: built-ins, media space for flat screen TVs and gaming systems, and areas of the home wired for technology. Buyers also want combined kitchen, family room, and living room open space. Universal design features, she said, will be incorporated in much more subtle ways.

- Erica Christoffer, REALTOR®Magazine

You can reach me at 615-777-4663 or via email at George.Margrave@MIGOnline.com

Grown Children Still at Home?

I heard today that there are more men and women ages 25 to 34 living at home with their parents than at any time since 1981. This number is now 30% of that age group and the number is historically at 28%. So that means that I have a bunch of readers who are affected by this situation. I know it is nice to be with the family, but I also know this can be very awkward. We at MIG can help. Our first time buyer program gives us the ability to get these potential homeowners into a new home or condo in many cases with no cash out of pocket required. And the payment is usually cheaper than renting a comparable place since the interest rates are so low. And if this plan doesn't work, we could put you parents on the loan with the younger person and get them packing their bags. Please call (615-777-4663) or e-mail me for details, email address is george.margrave@migonline.com  

Have You Heard?

You probably haven't heard, but Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have done it again. The are making it way more expensive for 75% of your clients and mine to buy or refinance with conventional loans. They have taken risk based pricing to new lows. For example if your client has an 800 score and has a higher loan to value than 75% they will pay a quarter point more (that doesn't sound like much by it adds up to a thousand dollars on a $400,000 loan). If they have a 679 score and a 79% LTV it is 2.75 points. I have trouble even counting that high.


These agencies are bleeding red ink with all the foreclosures, but guess what, if you don't have income you will never reverse the losses. And the loans of the last couple of years have to be performing well. The whole idea of risk based pricing is supposed to charge those with the higher risk more and reward those with low risk. It is not supposed to penalize almost everyone. Almost every conventional loan with a loan to value over 70% had the hit go up, some as much as a half point.


At a time when our industries need all the help we can get we get this. It just delayed our recovery some more. It is bound to push some folks into renting instead of buying. I say lets look at FHA every time we can, because these hits combined with the higher PMI rates are not pretty. Let me help you with the best loan type for your client. Also, contact your represenatives. They have said they want to get the government out of mortgage financing, but their actions are pushing us in the wrong direction.


You can reach me at 615-777-4663 or text me at 615-481-5626 or via email at George.Margrave@MIGonline.com

What Is The Rate Today?

People call every day and say “what is the rate”? They just don’t realize what they are asking. Here are a few of the things I need to know before I can quote it.

1. Price or value if a refinance
2. Length of time to lock the rate in
3. Borrowers middle credit score
4. How much down payment (or equity if a refinance)
5. Type of property (such as condo, PUD, Manufactured home, single family or duplex)
6. Term desired
7. Loan type such as VA, FHA, THDA, Rural Housing or conventional.

And this isn’t all. When I have this info, I will probably say let me call you back in a few minutes. Just thought you might want to know why you need to deal with someone you trust.

Give me a call at 615-777-4663 or shoot me an email at George.Margrave@migonline.com if I can be of any help or if you have questions. 

Is Now the Time to Sell?

Is now the time to sell? I am going to mention mostly financial angles to consider when making this decision. And certainly, these are not the only considerations.

Many of you may have put off a move that you wanted to make. One reason may be that you have no equity in your home or may even be upside down. In that case you might not have a choice. However, if you have some money set aside, you may be able to pull it off.

That means you will have to put some money into the transaction to get to the closing table. We’re seeing this in many cases and are even refinancing some homes where borrowers are having to put some money into the deal to get a great interest rate. A short sale can be considered, but in most cases that means you will not be able to buy again for several years.

Again you have to consider the cash required to buy the new house. You will probably be able to move to the next house at a great price and at a great interest rate. If you are a Veteran or buy in a rural area you may be able to buy with no cash. If you don’t fit one of those categories you may want to go FHA which is 3.5% down. The cost on any of these can be paid by the seller or by the lender. (Ask me how)

If you would like to take a look at some numbers for yourself, give me a call at 615-777-4663 and we can take a look at it for you.

"All good things must come to an end..." or so the popular saying goes. And right now many people are wondering if this sentiment holds true for the historic low rates we've seen this year. Here's what last week's news suggests: First, it's important to understand that home loan rates are based on Mortgage Backed Securities, which is a type of Bond. Bonds typically help provide some built in "assistance" when the nation is suffering economic headwinds. For example, negative economic news serves to help Bond prices improve and rates decline, including home loan rates. This is helpful to have when the economy is struggling, as buyers of all products - including homes - need the extra incentive of low rates to be encouraged to buy.

But now, the sharply higher expectations for future economic growth has caused rates to climb - particularly including home loan rates, since the Fed announced its second round of "Quantitative Easing" or QE2 on November 3rd. With QE2, the Fed will purchase $600 Billion in Treasury Securities through mid-2011 to keep our economic recovery on track.

But is there any likelihood rates can rebound? Many experts expect that home loan rates will continue to move higher over time because:

• At its meeting last week, the Fed left the door open for further QE programs if our economic recovery requires which, like QE2, could hurt Bonds and home loan rates.
• Congress passed the $858 Billion Tax Cut Bill, and while this is a good economic stimulus, in the short run it adds to the ever-growing deficit - also bad for Bonds and home loan rates.
• Last week's Producer Price Index and Consumer Price Index Reports showed that the Fed appears to be on tract with their goal of stimulating a bit more inflation. Inflation erodes the value of the fixed return provided by a Bond, which causes home loan rates to rise.

It's important to understand that rates don't simply rise in a straight line. In fact, Bonds and home loan rates did have a late-week, and that trend of rates worsening with improving dips here and there like we saw last week may be what's in store for us in the weeks and months ahead. At the end of the day, the ongoing and potential addition of further stimulus from the Fed, combined with the stimulus from the tax cuts, will make it tough for Bonds and home loan rates to return to the levels seen earlier this year.

But the good news is that home loan rates are still extremely attractive right now. If you have been thinking about purchasing or refinancing a home, call or email me now to get started. Or forward this blog on to someone you know who may benefit from today's historically low rates.

From Mortgage Market Guide

You may think the following is a strange topic for the Real Estate Corner, but Student loans are a huge obstacle to people wanting to buy a home. Here are some tips.

Student Loans: How Much to Borrow?
by Farnoosh Torabi on 12/06/2010

My recent post on student loan bankruptcy continues to evoke comments from numerous borrowers fighting to make ends meet. Sophia Vackimes writes in that her $250,000 student loan is proving difficult to manage in a stagnant job market, even with her Ph.D. Another reader, Mike, responds that he has more than $80,000 in debt, while earning $30,000 a year.

Those loan figures are above average, but not uncommon in a time where college costs have practically tripled since the 1980s (inflation-adjusted). According to a new report by Pew Research, students who graduated with a bachelor's degree in 2008 borrowed roughly $15,000 (adjusted for inflation), which is a far cry from the numbers above, but still 50 percent more money than what graduating students borrowed in 1996.

What lender in its right mind gives a teenager (figuring you're 18 or 19 when you assume student loans) up to hundreds of thousands of dollars in student loans? And what borrower in his or her right mind accepts?

While we can't exactly control lenders' decisions, we can control what we, as borrowers take on. Just like you wouldn't (or shouldn't) accept a $500,000 mortgage if you're only making $50,000 a year (though banks granted those types of mortgages a few years ago), students should not take on more than they can feasibly carry. The average graduating salary offer for a bachelor's degree student is $47,673, according to NACE's Salary Survey.

For aspiring college students weighing their financing options, consider the following ballpark math for a manageable amount of student loan debt. Consider federal loans first, private loans never.

1. Consider your first year salary. Figure you'll make the average $47,673 the first year you graduate. That's close to $36,000 after taxes, assuming a 25% tax bracket.

2. Consider your budget. If your student loans were to make up 5% to 10% of your monthly budget, which is reasonable, considering you will have rent, car payments, some credit card debt, food and utilities, among other expenses, then you want a loan that requires a payment of no more than $360 a month - maximum. At the federal lending rate of 6.8% and a repayment term of 10 years, that's approximately $60,000 in student loans, which still even sounds a bit high to me. Yes, you will boost your earnings potential and can afford to pay more years down the line, but best to stay conservative here, since, again the banks certainly won't be. And not to be cynical, but who knows if you'll be able to get a job right away? It may take several months to land a job, as many current college graduates will tell you.

Bottom line: There are many ways to obtain an education in this country. Drowning in debt should not be one of them. Financial institutions won't likely tell you this. It's tough to accept the advice, since we all want to go to the best schools and get the best educations and that all comes at a price - far more than $60,000 - but like anything else in this world, if you can't afford it, figure out other ways to make it happen. In the financial world you often need to step in and be your own financial advocate. After all, no one cares more about your money than you.

my email address is george.margrave@migonline.com